I don’t care if people don’t agree with anything that I say or believe,
if they hate all of my interpretations and every single one of my beliefs. It really doesn’t matter to me. Some of my closest friends and most trusted
confidantes disagree with me on a huge number of my beliefs, especially many of
those that I tend to post about on this blog.
So what I do care about is people having enough respect for the fact I
am a (relatively) rational adult with the free will, freedom, and intelligence
to make my own decisions, to form my own thoughts, and to have my own interpretations.
In today’s culture (and perhaps in the past as well), “tolerance” is a
dirty, four-letter word among many Christians.
For some reason, they view it as a requirement to give up every one of
their beliefs, to concede to total universalism, and to never even be used in
expanding the Church.
I understand that fear, and while I find it ludicrous (and have
probably addressed it elsewhere), that’s not what I’m talking about right here. What I’m so incredibly twisted around about currently
is the idea that, even among fellow Christian believers, there cannot be
dissention, disagreements, or alternative interpretations.
I’ve said it before, in fact I said it incredibly recently on this very
blog, but I will reiterate: for Christians, beyond the “essentials of
Christianity” (usually defined as a handful of doctrines including man’s sinful
nature, God’s holiness, Jesus’ life, death and resurrection, and the creation
of the Church), there is much room for interpretations. In fact, a Jewish rabbi once said that with
every passage of Scripture there are thousands of ways to understand what it
means. Furthermore, even in Biblical
times, there was valid and acceptable dissention in the early church. Peter and Paul had sincere doctrinal
disagreements. Paul once said “Everything
is permissible, but not everything is beneficial.” And while, according to my own arguments,
this statement can be interpreted any number of ways, what I understand it to
mean, in light of the context of the passage, is that different Christians can
and will have sincere disagreements over doctrines, over how to act, over moral
choices. What matters is not coming to
some universal agreement on every minutia, but instead to believe what we
believe, act the way we have come to understand is correct, while keeping a
watchful eye for situations in which some spiritual or other leadership role
would cause our beliefs and actions to become “stumbling blocks” to others.
Additionally, the thought that it is every Christian’s job to “judge”
their fellow believers is so beyond my comprehension, it’s laughable. Jesus said, “Take the beam out of your own
eye before trying to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.” I’m not saying there is no place for
encouraging and challenging your fellow believers to re-evaluate their actions
or beliefs in light of Scriptures. There
is. But I simply can’t wrap my head
around the thought that, as a Christian, I have the right to walk up to any
fellow believer, no matter my relationship with them, and, in judgment, try and
force them to accede to my own beliefs and interpretations.
As I said, there is a role for constructive criticism, for
accountability. But, from what I’ve come
to understand, this role should be (and is) fulfilled in my life by certain
individuals who truly know me, have the opportunities and abilities to see the
way that I both speak and live, and in whom there is a relationship of mutual
respect.
If among believers as a whole there is no room for differing opinions,
for alternate interpretations, for “agreeing to disagree,” for tolerance, the
church, and ultimately the world, would be in a constant state of war. Every believer would perpetually be trying to
force their beliefs down every presumed Christian’s throat, and I don’t see any
way other than it getting bloody at some point.
In my opinion, this thought that tolerance is unacceptable is simply
dangerous.
And while I, by nature of my own thoughts on the subject, will tolerate
my fellow believers’ opposing views on tolerance, I must set up boundaries
between myself and them if they choose to try and shove their beliefs down my
throat. I cannot have rational
conversations with people who won’t even respect me enough to allow me to have
differing opinions, who won’t tolerate my opposing views.
Well even with freedom of politics, religion, beliefs, etc...we have to remember to watch how we state things. Even though you dont care about what people thing about your beliefs, I know you better to know that you care(or should) about how people feel. Sometimes feelings get hurt and its not the end of the world, but it is our responsibility as adults to make sure that we are being responsible with what we say and do. And you know I will not shove my beliefs down your throat. But I will express them to you, and that's okay too. Like the fact that we as Christians should tolerate for the intolerable, so good for you for tolerating it!
ReplyDeleteash
I completely agree with everything you've said. I know I need to work on tailoring my posts on here so as not to directly hurt people. As I've said previously here, I'm still trying to figure out a balance between been bluntly honest and being careful not to hurt people. I don't know where that line is, but I am continually working on it and I invite anyone who feels hurt to ask me to clarify or whatever. But in clarifying I offer zero guarantee that I'm gonna change my mind on my overall principles and beliefs.
Delete